Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Trump-induced existential anxiety has torn the nation apart, but it's fixable.

No matter who you are, or what side of the political spectrum you fall on, it is likely that President Donald Trump has significantly increased your anxiety levels, distorting your perception of the world and negatively affecting your behavior in ways you are unaware of. 

But the good news is that these cognitive biases and behavioral changes can be reversed if one becomes cognizant of their existence and makes a conscious effort.

The human brain is a statistical machine that must constantly be making judgments and predictions based on beliefs, feelings, and past experiences. Trump’s fear mongering and fiery rhetoric is designed to heighten emotions and alter beliefs, offsetting this fine-tuned and calibrated system. If there’s one thing that Trump understands, it’s how to benefit politically from manufacturing fear and division. He may only be following his gut instincts, but it’s strategic psychological manipulation nonetheless.




Trump provokes anxiety in both the right and the left perhaps equally, albeit in very different ways.

For the right, he fuels their fears about minorities and dissimilar others, calling Hispanic immigrants “murderers and rapists,” and stating in blanket-fashion that “Islam hates us.”


His demonization of the “liberal media” and the Obama administration has transformed many right-wingers into full-fledged conspiracy theorists and for the left, President Trump is the fear. 


His narcissistic personality and unpredictable, unrestrained behavior makes him a dangerous commander-in-chief as one likes to get the U.S. into  games of chicken with countries led by similarly erratic leaders.

Trump’s policies and willingness to please his most extreme supporters threatens the rights of gays, transgender folk, and women across the country. The only thing liberals might fear worse than Trump himself is the sentiment he brings out in his supporters, which has already proved deadly in Charlottesville, Virginia.




As a result of the amplified fear and anxiety on the right and the left, the nation is more polarized than ever, and tensions seem to be at an all-time high.

So how is this heightened collective anxiety affecting us, exactly? 

What measurable effects does it have on our cognition and behavior?

Mortality salience increases tribalism and aggression toward out-group members.

Hundreds of studies in peer-reviewed journals have shown that when people are reminded of their mortality or exposed to a perceived existential threat — in other words, mortality is made salient, the result is a clear and predictable change in our attitudes and behavior toward others. Specifically, stimuli or events that conjure up thoughts about death cause people to cling more strongly to their cultural worldviews, increasing their support for those who share their national, ethnic, or political identity, and increasing their intolerance and aggression toward those who do not. According to Terror Management Theory, this happens because cultural worldviews — like religions, political ideologies, and national identities — help curb existential anxiety by instilling life with some form of meaning and value. Essentially, intense anxiety over a perceived threat to one’s well-being promotes tribalism, and no one is immune to it.




In fact, studies have shown that when participants are primed to think about their mortality, with something like a video or a story about death, their nationalistic bias significantly increases. We can see evidence of the psychological effects of Donald Trump’s fear mongering in the dramatic increase in nationalism and xenophobia displayed by the alt-right movement.

More evidence for this effect comes from a psychology study that found that making mortality salient increased support for extreme military interventions by American forces that could kill thousands of civilians overseas, an effect that was present only in conservatives.

By constantly emphasizing existential threat, Trump fuels the fears of Americans who will bolster their support for him in an attempt to feel safer. While this strategy keeps his supporters energized and loyal, the whole country suffers from the prejudice, aggression, and division it creates.




But the existential fear associated with Trump’s reign doesn’t just affect those on the right side of the political spectrum. 

Mortality salience can cause centrists and moderate liberals to shift their voting towards the right, and it can also cause liberals to be pushed further to the left. 


Since mortality salience fosters aggression towards those with opposing cultural worldviews, the perceived threat posed by Trump and his supporters has shifted many liberals towards more extreme positions than would be normally expected. In accordance with this concept, America has seen the rise of the militant left-wing group known as Antifa, whose tactics have progressively grown more violent towards the alt-right and neo-Nazis in a number of recent real-world confrontations.

Liberals who fear the nationalist surge the nation is witnessing become less tolerant of those they see as supporting Trump and his views towards immigrants, and more sympathetic towards the violent antics of Antifa because they are seen as well-intentioned, despite the fact that violence will ultimately be counterproductive to the liberal cause. Additionally, due to the worldview bolstering effects of existential fear and anxiety, liberals who feel threatened ideologically will tend to enforce their left-wing norms more than usual. While this might seem like a positive thing on the surface, given liberal ideals, a recent study has shown that the over-enforcement of PC norms actually serves to increase support for Donald Trump.




So, what’s the solution? How do we break the polarizing positive feedback cycle that Trump-related anxiety and fear has established? How do we reverse the division and aggression and begin to come together?

First, we must become acutely aware of the polarizing effect of Donald Trump’s presidency on both sides of the political aisle. We must openly acknowledge that the anxiety and fear created by Trump is pushing us all to our extremes, leading to tribal behavior and biases that can cloud our rational judgment.


Second, we must act in ways that alleviate these effects, and that means making a conscious effort to de-escalate confrontations and curb aggressive attitudes toward those who don’t share our worldviews or national identities.


Don’t just delete those friends on social media who have opposing political opinions, no matter how much you may despise some of those beliefs. We must engage each other in rational discourse, and we must strive to see the legitimate points made by all sides, regardless of the abundance of illogical ones. And throughout this engagement process, we must stay calm and collected, as aggression only makes the division worse by increasing mortality salience. While this idea might seem futile to many liberals who have long given up on trying to talk sense into Trump supporters, we must remember that trying to heal the division is our only option. Simply letting it get worse will only lead to further chaos in America, and could contribute to another four years of this administration.


Lastly, we must not only try to build bridges when possible, we should monitor ourselves from becoming too extreme, especially when behavior towards ideologically dissimilar others becomes aggressive and violent. 

When that happens, the moral high ground is lost. 
As satisfying as it might be to watch a neo-Nazi like Richard Spencer get punched in the face, it is imperative that we remember that, in the words of Martin Luther King, Jr., “Hate begets hate; violence begets violence,” a concept that is supported by the results of Terror Management Theory and mortality salience studies.





If we all truly strive to make these efforts and resist getting discouraged by the inevitable challenges, then the nation will slowly begin to come together, and a new, stronger form of order will emerge from the current sea of chaos.






Thursday, December 13, 2018

Why Wouldn't God Want Adam and Eve to Have Knowledge of Good and Evil?

The Bible says that God created Adam and Eve and put them in a beautiful garden full of trees with good fruit.

However, God also created a tree that would give the eater the knowledge of good and evil - commanding Adam not to eat its fruit. 

Why would God create something that was banned and, specifically, why would it be a tree whose fruit offered knowledge of good and evil? Isn't knowledge good?

Skeptics often complain that God set Adam and Eve up to fail. However, God had to give Adam and Eve a choice. Without free will to choose, Adam and Eve would have been mere puppets. True love always requires choice. God wanted Adam and Eve to choose to love and trust Him. The only way to give this choice would have been to command something that was not allowed. Since God had planted in the garden all the different trees from which we now get fruit, the test was not too difficult. Adam and Eve had plenty to eat and a large variety of fruits from which to choose, and could have chosen to believe God. They were only commanded not to eat from one tree out of the many.


God did not want Adam and Eve to experience evil or even know about it.
However, Satan had already rebelled against God and then tempted Eve to join him in rebellion against God.

Satan used the oldest ploy in his playbook of deceit - God is a cosmic killjoy who is trying to keep something good from you. 

Satan first asked Eve about the tree from which they were told not to eat. 


Eve told Satan they were not to eat of the forbidden fruit or they would die. Satan's reply indicated that God was a liar and that He just wanted to keep something good (the fruit) from them, saying, "God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." So, Adam and Eve gained knowledge of the difference between good and evil through direct experience, instead of through instruction by God. The text suggests that Adam and Eve had enjoyed daily walks with God through the garden prior to their fall (Genesis 3:8). The knowledge of evil brought fear and shame to Adam and Eve (Genesis 3:10). So, the knowledge of good and evil was not a good thing, since it ruined their innocent relationship with God and each other.


Skeptics claim that God set up Adam and eve to fail by giving them a test that was either too difficult or deceptive.

However, the Bible makes it clear that God gave Adam and Eve all they needed - with lots of different trees from which to eat fruit.

It is clear that Eve knew she should not eat from the one tree in the middle of the garden that she was instructed to avoid.


Instead of believing God and trusting Him, after all He had done for them, Eve chose to believe the lies of Satan (in snake form), and believed that God was lying to her. 
She ate the forbidden fruit and convinced her husband to do the same, resulting in their loss of innocence and a broken relationship with God and each other. Yes, they now had knowledge of good and evil, but it wasn't quite as originally advertised by the snake. We still have the same choice as Adam and Eve. We can gain the knowledge of evil by directly participating in it or we can believe God and avoid the things He has said are bad for us.





Sunday, December 9, 2018

Going farther against Politico Bullying: Your life is not worthless, no matter what Elitists say or how they treat you.

Where Jesus Christ stood ridiculed long ago, he still understands what America is going through 
under Trumpism today.
He can still give us the strength needed under Free Will through a truthful heart oriented desire to overcome where god promised after World War II that same birth rights shall not experience same grace where now knowing is in no longer in excuse. 


Why bullies bully.
Some people pick on others because of things going on in their own lives. 
They might envy or even resent for something beyond voter control. They might have a difficult situation and target to fulfill a need to be in control. 
Perhaps they feel they are not treated well or have a negative view of themselves. Maybe they receive little attention from people around them. 
It could be that the person or people making Americas life miserable are simply trying to take the focus off of their own problems.
 Some bullies bully others to gain attention, status or approval from their peers.
While these things might not be the case, keep in mind that you might not be the only one facing a hard situation. While there’s no excuse for bullying, recognizing a motive might help you respond in the best way.
Response While the word “bully” does not appear in the Bible, the idea of treating others in a brutish or disrespectful way does. Christians can even be a specific target of bullies since trying to live like Christ is often counter cultural.
Matthew 5:39 says, “Do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.” However, this doesn’t mean you can’t ask for God’s defense or stand up for yourself.
When responding to a bullying situation, remember that the Bible tells us to treat others fairly and with respect. Matthew 22:39 says to love others as yourself. And Romans 12:18 advises, “If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone.” When faced with someone talking bad about you, making fun of you or putting you down, do not seek revenge but respond in love. Matthew 5:44 says to “love your enemies,” and Matthew 5:9 says peacemakers will be blessed. Luke 6:28 even says, “Bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.”
How you treat others reflects your relationship with God since He created and values everyone. When you respond to bullies in love, they notice and might even change their attitude toward you. Proverbs 15:I says, “A gentle answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger.”
At the same time, if the bullying is negatively affecting you—mentally, emotionally or physically—do not allow yourself to remain in danger, but seek support from a trusted adult or authority figure.

 Remember that our strength comes not from ourselves, but from God who cares about us and gives us hope. Let that give you confidence to endure. Psalm 34:4-5 says, “I sought the Lord, and He answered me; He delivered me from all my fears. Those who look to Him are radiant; their faces are never covered with shame.”
Sometimes, it’s wise to even flee from a bully. Out of jealousy, King Saul in the Bible chased David, and David fled (I Samuel 19-24). Fleeing from a bully isn’t cowardly; it’s often the best choice when we can’t protect ourselves. Ask God for wisdom in how you should respond, and trust Him to bring justice.

If it is a fellow Christian who is wronging you, Matthew 18:15-17 says to point out the wrongdoing to the person. If that person doesn’t listen, ask one or two others to approach him or her with you. If that doesn’t change anything, bring the issue to your church.
Regardless of the situation, we can find comfort and protection in God. Psalm 46:I says, “God is our refuge and strength, an ever-present help in trouble.” Let His strength encourage you today.
Protecting others
Ephesians 5 and 6 calls husbands to defend their families and businesses. And it’s up to parents to try to protect their children from danger.
If your family is being politico bullied, don’t assume it will just go away. It might help to role-play how they can respond so that he or she feels prepared to face the incumbent bully. Keep the line of communication open especially with your children, and don’t hesitate to get another adult, professional, or school administrator involved to help resolve the issue(S).


Monday, December 3, 2018

Proverbs 28:16 - A tyrannical ruler practices extortion, but one who hates ill-gotten gain will enjoy a long reign.

The president's behavior, explained.

Why does President Trump behave in the dangerous and seemingly self-destructive ways he does?

Trump’s sense of self-worth is forever at risk.


Trump’s worldview was profoundly and self-protectively shaped by his father view on how to survive and why Trump will remain compelled to go to war with the world as a binary, zero-sum choice for him: 

He either dominates or you will submit. He must create through exploited fear, or feels he will be succumbed to it appears to be the false pride neurosis based upon why his older brother did suggests an additional potentiate behind why he has no control over  driving force(S) that haunt the mind. 




Many of the deals in “The Art of the Deal” were massive failures — among them the casinos he owned and the launch of a league to rival the National Football League — but Trump had each of them described as a huge success.



What is clear is that he has and still is spent in a life seeking to dominate others by whatever that requires and whatever collateral damage it creates along the way.

Within this mindset “The Art of the Deal,” at best as a street-fight from one who relishes competing under I love to go up against, and love to beat them suggests from medical perspectives a narcissism that has no sense of any guilt or contrition about anything done and certainly would never share any misgivings publicly holds a Simple English shadow: all present and future deals shall be remembered as the era where Smart selfishness became powerless over stupid selfishness and Congress, senate alike had no integral fortitude to stop it - condemns it. 




Proverbs 28:16-26

16 A tyrannical ruler practices extortion, but one who hates ill-gotten gain will enjoy a long reign. 
17 Anyone tormented by the guilt of murder will seek refuge in the grave; let no one hold them back. 
18 The one whose walk is blameless is kept safe, but the one whose ways are perverse will fall into the pit. 
19 Those who work their land will have abundant food, but those who chase fantasies will have their fill of poverty.



20 A faithful person will be richly blessed, but one eager to get rich will not go unpunished.
21 To show partiality is not good— yet a person will do wrong for a piece of bread.
22 The stingy are eager to get rich and are unaware that poverty awaits them. 
23Whoever rebukes a person will in the end gain favor rather than one who has a flattering tongue. 
24 Whoever robs their father or mother and says, “It’s not wrong,” is partner to one who destroys. 
25 The greedy stir up conflict, but those who trust in the LORD will prosper. 

26 Those who trust in themselves are fools, but those who walk in wisdom are kept safe.






Unlike Nixon, urges toward voluntary resignation from medical perspectives look to be Americas most humane circumstantial consideration under what should have never been allowed to come to pass in the first place took responsibility for in which benefited another who was never temperament suited to hold a executive branch position of such importance as it's representative to the world.