Discipline is the means for solving life’s problems. All
disciplines are a form of submission.
The Discipline to Discern what we are or not responsible
for is most crucial, since we must go through the existential suffering of choosing
when and what to submit and what not to submit to.
When we were young we more or less had to submit, but
when we grow into adulthood, we have to make decisions about when and how no to
submit toward others values.
Not all submission is good.
We must figure out to what extent we are going to submit
to society and to what extent we are going to disagree with society, just as we
must choose our values every step of the way.
Ultimately, we have to choose whether or not to submit to
God and, indeed, even choose the kind of God such as Dough boy that we are
going to submit to.
The term “higher power” first appeared in, or at least
was initially popularized by, the Twelve Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous. The
term implies that there is something “higher” than us as individuals (Dough
Boys) and that it is appropriate to submit ourselves to that something higher,
be it Live, Light Truth, or God. “Thy will, not mine, be done is a glorious
expression of desire for such submission, and the key word is “Will.” Submission
implies an effective submission of the human will to something than (Dough)
than itself. “God” is light, God is love, and God is Truth.” People need not be
believers in God, but if they are to be healthy, they must submit themselves in
all affairs to these attributes of God.
Submission to the light might be defines as submission to
the choice of consciousness and hence sight-both external sight and,
particularly, insight.
Then there is the choice of whether to submit to
or not, the decision whether to extend or not extend oneself. This is not
simplistic especially when dealing with dough boy. Love is often very subtle
which is opposite of dough boy mentality and mysterious , Love is well defined
as the will to extend oneself for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or
another’s spiritual growth.
This definition is an acknowledgment that love is
far broader than dough, Monks and nuns, for example, don’t have dough, but many
are great Lovers in true sense of the word.
There are numerous paradoxes related to love of dough
that test myths and common thinking in our culture.
The best way to address
this unhealthy paradox is what it is not in order to combat our cultural
stereotypes.
For instance, we have been told that it is better to give than to
receive. In our unhealthy application it would be more appropriate to say that
it is just as good to receive as it is to give.
For these individuals it is obligatory to discount and as
destructive as to give it away.
We have been taught that “love is gentle, love is kind” –
not with dough boy where many times one must display what is called “TOUGH
LOVE”. Love is often ambiguous; sometimes it requires being stern.
Reality is that we cannot love well if we are constantly
extending ourselves to others and not nurturing ourselves. SUBMISSION TO LOVE DOES NOT
MEAN BEING A DOORMAT!
Throughout our lives we must choose what is and what is
not our responsibility , so we must also choose , even if we are submitted to
true love, when to love others and when to love ourselves.
The Key of loving begins with work on self. We can’t
begin to love others well until we lovingly work on ourselves.
When dealing with dough boy you most likely will find
them trying to heal In the name of love attempting to convert another usually selfishly,
controlling, and non loving despite all the ways we may think otherwise.
Because of New Millennium indoctrination in the name of
social advancement, many people equate Love with material and feel they must
live up simply due to others expectations.
The paradox is that many times just being who you are
rather than constantly focusing on what you do and what you have is the more
loving approach and question of importance that people ought to be able to
figure out answers for themselves.
Now we come to the matter of truth which dough boy fears,
is complex and demanding than merely accepting scientifically proven facts or
following the scientific methods of a laboratory think-tank.
Dedication to reality-to the truth- is one of the four
basic disciplines of living well.
Doughboy’s occasionally withhold a portion of the truth
under guise as loving thing to do, but even in this tiny bit of “fudging” with
the truth become potentially dangerous compelling to offer stringent criteria
for when telling white lies might be permissible.
THE FACT IS THAT WITHHOLDING A KEY PIECE
OF TRUTH FROM OTHERS IS OFTEN AS LEAST DECEPTIVE AS AN OUTRIGHT BLACK LIE.
SUCH LYING IS NOT JUST UNLOVING; IT IS ULTIMATELY HATEFUL.
EVERY INSTANCE OF IT ADS TO THE DARKNESS AND CONFUSION
OR WORLDS, CONVERSELY, SPEAKING THE TRUTH- PARTICULARLY WHEN IT REQUIRES SOME
RISK TO DO SO – IS AN ACT OF LOVE.
ITS DIMINISHES DARKNESS AND CONFUSION, INCREASING THE
LIGHT THE WORLD DESPERATELY NEEDS.
WHEN WE LIE, WE ARE USUALLY ATTEMPTING TO AVOID RESPONSIBILITY FOR OUR ACTIONS AND WHAT IS IMAGINED TO BE THEIR PAINFUL
CONSEQUENCES.
I am forever grateful to my parents for teaching me
during childhood a most pithy and powerful expression: “FACE THE MUSIC.
MEANING
FACE UP TO THE CONSEQUENCES; DON’T COVER UP; DON’T LIE; LIVE IN THE LIGHT.
Why “MUSIC”. Why should facing up to something
potentially painful be called facing music when we normally think of music as
pleasurable and Lovely? Perhaps the choice of word is deep and mystically
appropriate. For when we do submit ourselves to the DICTATES OF HONESTY,
we are I harmony with reality, and our lives, although never painless, will
become increasingly melodic.
We have been speaking of the choice for TRUTH as
if lying were something primarily done to another.
Not so. Our even greater proclivity is lying to
ourselves. Of course the two types of dishonesty feed off of each other in an EVER-ESCALATING
ORGY OF DECEPTION. BUT WHILE WE CAN DECEIVE SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE
TIME, CAPACITY OF SELF-DECEPTION IS POTENTIALLY UNLIMITED AS LONG AS ONE IS
WILLING TO PAY THE PRICE OF EVIL OR INSANITY AND THESE ARE THE ULTIMATE COSTS.
Self-deception is not a matter of being kind or gentle
with oneself; on the contrary, it is as hateful as lying to others, and for the
same reason: it adds to the darkness and confusion of self, augmenting the SHADOW
LAYER BY LAYER. Conversely, the choice to be HONEST with
oneself is the choice for psycho spiritual health and, therefore, the single
most loving choice we can ever make for ourselves.
In the realm of personal belief, we are faced with many
complex choices, and the certainties of science cannot readily be relied upon.
If we choose to believe something is TRUE, is it therefor true?
If so, submitting to Truth would be nothing more than submitting
to ourselves.
Since GOD is synonymous with TRUTH, in choosing to submit
to GOD we are submitting to a TRUTH HIGHER THAN OURSELVES. We are endowed with
the freedom to choose, we can submit to the wrong things.
There are only two
states of being: SUBMISSION TO GOD AND GOODNESS, OR THE
REFUSAL TO SUBMIT TO ANYTHING BEYOND ONE’S WILL and WHICH AUTOMATICALLY
ENSLAVES ONE TO THE FORCES OF EVIL, TO “THE FATHER OF LIES.”
C.S. LEWIS BEST
STATES:”THERE IS NO NEUTRAL GROUND IN THE UNIVERSE; EVERY SPLIT SECOND IS
CLAIMED BY GOD AND COUNTERCLAIMED BY SATIN.”
ONE MAY FEEL THAT THEIR SUPERIOR INTELLECT ENTITLES THEM THE ABILITY TO
STAND BETWEEN GOD AND THE DEVIL, UNCOMMITTED EITHER WAY.
“NOT TO CHOOSE IS TO CHOOSE”
FENCE STRADDLING THAT EVENTUALLY BECOMES “INTOLERABLE” AND
THE CHOICE OF UNSUBMISSION NOW MAKES YOU!
Life
experience senior community service edit rewrite, educational share.
Reference material : M. Scott Peck,
M.D.
From the book: The Road less Traveled and
Beyond, Spiritual Growth in an Age of Anxiety
No ownership or infringements are implied.
Senior community public safety service share.
Site stands on our U.S. constitution
First amendment rights under God.
No ownership implied with supportive media or jpeg.
No comments:
Post a Comment