Indeed organized criminal thinking protected by specialized law groups are doing exceptionally well in the land once known as Lincoln were justice more often than most can only be found worn on sleeves and invoice pilferages approved at a glance the way of the land.
Legal language generally just goes though hodgepodge motions containing outlandish words and phrases because these words and phrases are what the principles of law are made of…
Written in ordinary English, everybody could see how silly, how irrelevant and inconclusive they are… {And then} the law would lose its dignity and then its power – and so would the lawyers.
So legal languages at excesses of over $330.00 per hour primarily obstruct rather than assist the communications of ideals.
This is very useful to lawyers while the clock is ticking that enables them to keep saying relatively nothing with airs of great importance while getting away with it.
While lawyers as a whole cannot by any means be accused of deliberately hoodwinking the public certain select specialized law groups can be said to have with their devious dialectic and their precious principles and their language while the sounds that they make are essentially empty of meaning.
This by no means is strange-for self-deception, especially if self-serving is one of the easiest arts learned.
Life care side note: all motions were either last minute presented leaving relatively no time to decipher while some not revealed till court date in retrospect says a lot about the integrity behind charge in concern properness.
At this point let us leave the lawyer’s self-deception to the ARDC for disposition while we explore other sleight of hand.
Time and again the late justice Holmes would demolish a 50-page court opinion – written in sonorous legal sentencing with a few words of dissent, spoken in plain English: “The law as you lay it down sounds impressive and impeccable. But of course if really has nothing to do with the facts of the case.”
People want to learn new and better ways but first they must be foundational properly taught.
Pompous fraternity Jargon practitioners peddle theologies that John Q. Public is best advised to discard all that once had specific meaning by which now cannot an attitude merely describe fact?
These types of twisted phrases are true marks of devils advocates best distanced that forensic with no ethics in the air formal educators are teaching fine arts on how to become better criminals.
The sleight of hand here is to deploy generic quick work label that allows titlists to treat outsiders as merchandise.
This example of discourse under any rule thus makes its way to crafty attorneys and as time goes by they become quite adept within to the point that even judges do not fully understand nor have the time to decipher that lead to face value rulings and Mo’ money, Mo’ money, Mo’ Money instead of “Right and bravo!” say I stance.
The point in all this is we continually fail to achieve influence over sleights of hand in reforming procedure that would be helpful to the courts when crafters do not convey real meaning behind language that enables the law to ask qualified questions be answered.
An imaginary courtroom interrogation
Much depends on words differently understood by the participants in legal dialogue so never accept from an attorney that subsequent language is of no relative importance and if told that best suggest terminate on the spot.
Let us suppose, for the purpose of illustration, that the judge were to pre disposition case attorneys as to eliminate the adversarial element such as in 18th judicial 2015 p 888.
Judge is an enlightened and integrally conscious individual who really want to be in the know.
Finder in facts: starts off interrogating whether this respondent is properly in this court?
Life-care note: never done- complaint document alleged but listed no element of reference.
Correct plaintiff attorney ARDC answer: no your honor we can neither support allegation nor am I medically qualified to opinionate concern assumptions at this time.
Whether or not these findings qualify respondent as being proper is a legal moral question, not an officer of court one.
For public record: I had original assigned judge and ad-litem down case line both removed claiming blatant case bias through specific document client directs well precedence’d warning formal complaints will pursue if not executed.
Simple English documented in simple specific client directs amended as required not only protects against hearsay, but makes possible what your average John Q. Public thinks are important such as not being violated while highly compensating that remind you were retained to defend the constitution, you know the one the nine men in Washington are always talking about - not socialize while maintaining favorable association club status.
The basis of Forensic evidence
Though probate highly discounts attorney criminal mindedness behind questionable illness utilized asset motions – forensic requirements as pioneering standard would greatly contribute toward reduction of unworthy cases in precedent of 2015 p 888 in which now - ordered bank - will be put up on formal state regulating department charges in complaint siting discriminatory practices suspicioned to include probable fee gouging vantages status of order.
The shadow
Most of integrity when pushed up against the wall by evidence of our own sins, failures, or imperfections, will acknowledge their shadows rather than not own up to them while trying to sweep all potential consciousness under neatly prearranged rugs
Illinois senior citizens have earned right to expect under God - safe retirement environment that are state free of known predatory guardianship, banking, and unethical Law groups.
Jung is accredited within translations for the masses, his reoccurred popularity has a great deal to do with publications presented at the right time just when gnawing’s in dissatisfactions are beginning to be felt relatively saying nothing really new exists under the sun just retitled.
Story line based upon Life-care movement updated statuses in real time perspective.
The Moral man, said Freud, “is not he who is never tempted” but he who can resist his temptations.”
We thank Doctors Menninger, Peck and David Cantor as well as providing Libraries, for sharing of accrued wisdoms that enable others to successfully navigate through uncharted seas of none tranquility concerning new aged confusions in not only what U.S. integrity was but still fundamentally still all about.
Freedom does not come free but is worth fighting for holding all the right reasoning’s under God in community.
Not for profit senior community service - share -promoting better generational awareness through effective communications hoping to end senior persecution and privatized financial unsavoriness.
Allow no other to ever dictate to another under god; that their voice no longer holds relevance in today’s world.
No ownership or infringements are sought nor implied in extension of self-help recovery topical shares.
The Crime of Punishment - Karl Menninger, M.D.
Forensic Psychology – A Very Short Introduction by David Cantor
The Road Less Traveled and Beyond – Spiritual Growth in an Age of Anxiety by M. Scott Peck, M.D.
No comments:
Post a Comment